[1]
Leyngold MM. Is Unipedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap Obsolete Owing to Superiority of DIEP Flap? Annals of plastic surgery. 2018 Jun:80(6S Suppl 6):S418-S420. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001319. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 29369109]
[2]
Laurent B, Rouif M, Giordano P, Mateu J. [Breast reconstruction with TRAM flap after selective embolization of the deep inferior epigastric artery (series of 69 patients)]. Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique. 2011 Dec:56(6):548-54. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2011.09.008. Epub 2011 Oct 29
[PubMed PMID: 22041690]
[3]
Cyriac C, Sharma RK, Singh G. Assessment of the abdominal wall function after pedicled TRAM flap surgery for breast reconstruction: Use of modified mesh repair for the donor defect. Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2010 Jul:43(2):166-72. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.73430. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 21217974]
[4]
Kim EK, Lee TJ, Eom JS. Comparison of fat necrosis between zone II and zone III in pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps: a prospective study of 400 consecutive cases. Annals of plastic surgery. 2007 Sep:59(3):256-9
[PubMed PMID: 17721210]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence
[5]
Beahm EK, Walton RL. The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2007 Jul:120(1):41-54. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000263729.26936.31. Epub
[PubMed PMID: 17572543]
[6]
Nagasao T, Tamai M, Moromomi T, Miki T, Kogure T, Hamamoto Y, Kudo H, Tanaka Y. Preservation of deep-layer fat of lateral zones prevents postoperative seroma after TRAM-flap harvesting for breast reconstruction: a retrospective study. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. 2017 Oct:51(5):323-328. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1265530. Epub 2017 Jan 13
[PubMed PMID: 28084137]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidence
[7]
Yoon CS, Kim KN. Selective salvage of zones 2 and 4 in the pedicled TRAM flap: a focus on reducing fat necrosis and improving aesthetic outcomes. SpringerPlus. 2016:5():68. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1714-7. Epub 2016 Jan 22
[PubMed PMID: 26839761]
[8]
Yamaguchi S, De Lorenzi F, Petit JY, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Giraldo A, Rey PC, Urban C, Martella S, Bosco R. The "perfusion map" of the unipedicled TRAM flap to reduce postoperative partial necrosis. Annals of plastic surgery. 2004 Sep:53(3):205-9
[PubMed PMID: 15480004]
[9]
Gabbay JS, Eby JB, Kulber DA. The midabdominal TRAM flap for breast reconstruction in morbidly obese patients. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2005 Mar:115(3):764-70
[PubMed PMID: 15731676]
[10]
Simon AM, Bouwense CL, McMillan S, Lamb S, Hammond DC. Comparison of unipedicled and bipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions: assessment of physical function and patient satisfaction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2004 Jan:113(1):136-40
[PubMed PMID: 14707631]
[11]
Paige KT, Bostwick J 3rd, Bried JT, Jones G. A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1998 Jun:101(7):1819-27
[PubMed PMID: 9623822]
[12]
Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, Weldon ME. Immediate breast reconstruction: why the free TRAM over the conventional TRAM flap? Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1992 Aug:90(2):255-61; discussion 262
[PubMed PMID: 1631217]
[13]
Thoma A, Khuthaila D, Rockwell G, Veltri K. Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2003:23(4):287-95
[PubMed PMID: 12942517]
[14]
Yamamoto Y, Nohira K, Sugihara T, Shintomi Y, Ohura T. Superiority of the microvascularly augmented flap: analysis of 50 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1996 Jan:97(1):79-83; discussion 84-5
[PubMed PMID: 8532809]