Coronary Artery Calcification

Earn CME/CE in your profession:


Continuing Education Activity

Arterial calcium development is closely related to vascular injury, inflammation, and repair. Calcification occurs very early in the process of atherosclerosis; however, The presence of coronary calcification is universal in all patients with documented coronary artery disease. Coronary artery calcium is most commonly evaluated by noncontrast, electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated cardiac electron beam computerized tomography (EBCT) or multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The presence of coronary calcium score is associated with plaque burden; however, it is not a marker of plaque vulnerability. Nonetheless, it provides insight into the patient’s level of cardiovascular disease risk and is helpful for guiding interventions or preventing coronary artery disease. This activity describes the clinical evaluation of coronary artery calcification and explains the role of the health professional team in coordinating the care of patients with this condition.

Objectives:

  • Review the etiology of calcium in the coronary arteries.
  • Describe the evaluation of coronary calcification.
  • Summarize the treatment and management options for coronary calcification.
  • Explain the importance of interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination and communication to aid in prompt diagnosis of coronary arterial calcification and improving outcomes in patients diagnosed with the condition.

Introduction

Calcium is the most abundant mineral in the human body. Although the majority of calcium is found in teeth and bone, approximately 1% is dissolved in the bloodstream. As the human body ages, calcium can deposit in various parts of the body. Arterial calcium development is closely related to vascular injury, inflammation, and repair. Calcification occurs very early in the process of atherosclerosis; however, it is only able to be detected when it increases in quantity and using imaging modalities. This accumulation typically occurs after the age of 40 in men and women. The presence of coronary calcification is universal in all patients with documented coronary artery disease. Coronary artery calcium is most commonly evaluated by noncontrast, electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated cardiac electron beam computerized tomography (EBCT) or multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The presence of coronary calcium score is associated with plaque burden; however, it is not a marker of plaque vulnerability.  Nonetheless, it gives an insight into the patient’s level of cardiovascular disease risk and is helpful for guiding interventions or preventing coronary artery disease.[1][2][3][4]

Etiology

Coronary artery calcification increases with age and is more common in men than women. Furthermore, people with metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, tobacco use, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and a high baseline C-reactive protein level are at an increased risk to develop coronary artery calcification. It is to be noted that coronary artery calcification has 2 main subtypes, intimal and medial. Intimal artery calcification is correlated with advanced age, tobacco use, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. Conversely, medial calcification is associated with kidney disease.

Epidemiology

The presence of coronary artery calcification is age and gender-dependent. It is present in 90% of men and 67% of women older than the age of 70.

Pathophysiology

It is well known that coronary calcification causes reduced myocardial perfusion, abnormal vasomotor response, and overall impaired vascular compliance. Several theories have been proposed about the development of coronary artery calcification. However, the entire mechanism is currently unknown. Mechanisms theorized include calcium-phosphorus imbalance, apoptotic bodies, induction of bone formation, and the role of vascular smooth muscle cells. Nonetheless, it is known that calcification in the coronary arteries can occur as early as the second decade of life, immediately after fatty streak formation. Laboratory analysis of lesions of young adults has demonstrated aggregation of crystalline calcium among lipid particles. Furthermore, calcific deposits are found in greater quantities in older adults and complex lesions.[5][6][7]

History and Physical

Although coronary artery calcification itself has no specific clinical manifestations, it has significant important prognostic implications. It can independently predict future cardiovascular events and reclassify patients into more accurate categories.

Evaluation

Diagnostic Methods

Chest Radiography

Coronary calcification is not easily detected on routine chest radiography. Although chest radiography is inexpensive, it has very poor sensitivity in detecting coronary artery calcification. Chest radiography is not recommended for coronary artery calcification detection. 

Computed Tomography

The detection of coronary artery calcification via CT scan was made possible in the 1980s after the development of the electron-beam CT (EBCT) scanner. This was due to the significantly superior speed of the CT scanner. The superior speed enabled heart motion to be paused long enough to detect calcification in the coronary arteries. Furthermore, the development of the multi-detector CT scan has allowed even faster acquisition of images.

The evaluation of coronary artery calcium scoring via CT offers a fast, reproducible, and relatively cheap modality to determine the extent and presence of coronary calcification. Patients, prior to the test, do not need any specific preparation or intravenous access. Scans are typically obtained with prospective electrocardiogram triggering during diastole. After imaging is acquired, the extent of calcification is quantified using the Agatston score. The Agatston score is obtained by multiplying the area of calcification by the corresponding density.

Currently, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association gives class IIa indication for asymptomatic patients with intermediate-risk (10% to 20%) 10-year risk of cardiac events based on the Framingham risk score, as well as for asymptomatic individuals 40 years and older with diabetes mellitus for coronary artery calcium scanning. CAC measurement is generally not recommended for patients at low (less than 10%) or high (greater than 20%) 10-year risk of cardiac events based on the Framingham risk score.

The following definitions have been used to quantify coronary artery calcium score and coronary plaque burden

  • 0: No identifiable disease
  • 1 to 99: Mild disease 
  • 100 to 399: Moderate disease
  • Greater than 400: Severe Disease

It is to be noted that although the presence of CAC can help predict the presence of coronary artery stenosis, it is generally a better marker for the extent of coronary atherosclerosis present rather than the degree of stenosis. In early atherosclerosis, there is a compensatory enlargement of the arteries to accommodate the plaque. Therefore, although extensive plaque burden may be present, there may not be any clinically relevant stenosis. Severe coronary calcification (Agatston score greater than 1000) is associated with advanced obstructive coronary disease.

The effective radiation exposure with EBCT is approximately 0.7 to 1.0 mSv in men and 0.9 to 1.3 mSv in women. MDCT has a slightly higher radiation dose of 1.0 to 1.5 mSv in men and 1.1 to 1.9 mSv in women. To place this in context, the average annual background radiation in the United States is 3.0 to 3.6 mSv.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MRI has a very limited role due to difficulties in detecting small quantities of calcification. Currently, there is no indication for MRI in the detection of coronary artery calcification.

Treatment / Management

There have been advances in the treatment of coronary artery calcification. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for the modification of severe coronary artery calcification was seen in the Disrupt CAD III study.[8] Risk factor modification is recommended and includes treating hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, as well as preventing the development of advanced kidney disease. In addition, the presence of coronary artery calcification makes a percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac catheterization more challenging. Techniques that can be utilized during cardiac catheterization in addition to drug-eluting or bare metal stent placement include rotational, orbital, or laser atherectomy and cutting balloons.[9][10][11]

Differential Diagnosis

  • Acute pericarditis
  • Angina pectoris
  • Atherosclerosis
  • Coronary artery vasospasm
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy
  • Familial hypercholesterolemia
  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Hypertension
  • Kawasaki disease
  • Myocarditis

Prognosis

Coronary artery calcification in several large observational studies has been shown to predict future cardiovascular events. Furthermore, when added to commonly used risk prediction models, CAC significantly improves risk prediction and stratification compared to other biomarkers. It can correctly classify patients into low-risk and high-risk categories. Patients have an extremely low risk of cardiovascular disease and events if they have no coronary calcification detected (CAC score of 0). For example, in patients who are classified as low risk due to risk factors present or Framingham risk score, a CAC of 100 indicated an estimated 10-year all-CHD event rate of nearly 10%. However, in patients classified as high risk due to risk factors present, a CAC score of 0 is associated with a 10-year all-CHD event risk of only 3%. Asymptomatic patients who are in the intermediate-risk category most commonly undergo CAC scoring due to guideline recommendations. A CAC score of greater than 400 is associated with worse clinical outcomes. This illustrates the ability of coronary artery calcification scoring to help reclassify the risk of many patients and estimate future cardiovascular events.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Healthcare workers, including the primary caregiver and nurse practitioner, frequently see patients with coronary artery disease. Often these patients are referred to a cardiologist, where imaging studies are done to determine the degree of calcification in the coronary vessels.

Coronary artery calcification in several large observational studies has been shown to predict future cardiovascular events. Furthermore, when added to commonly used risk prediction models, CAC significantly improves risk prediction and stratification compared to other biomarkers. It can correctly classify patients into low-risk and high-risk categories. Patients have an extremely low risk of cardiovascular disease and events if they have no coronary calcification detected (CAC score of 0).

Currently, there is no known specific treatment for coronary artery calcification. Risk factor modification is recommended and includes treating hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, as well as preventing the development of advanced kidney disease. In addition, the presence of coronary artery calcification makes a percutaneous coronary intervention during cardiac catheterization more challenging. Techniques that can be utilized during cardiac catheterization in addition to drug-eluting or bare-metal stent placement include rotational, orbital, or laser atherectomy and cutting balloons.


Details

Author

Jay Mohan

Author

Karan Bhatti

Author

Adam Tawney

Editor:

Roman Zeltser

Updated:

1/27/2023 6:25:05 PM

References


[1]

Reed GW, Rossi JE, Masri A, Griffin BP, Ellis SG, Kapadia SR, Desai MY. Angiographic predictors of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with radiation associated coronary artery disease. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2019 Sep 1:94(3):E104-E110. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28107. Epub 2019 Jan 28     [PubMed PMID: 30690850]


[2]

Chen Y, Hu Z, Li M, Jia Y, He T, Liu Z, Wei D, Yu Y. Comparison of Nongated Chest CT and Dedicated Calcium Scoring CT for Coronary Calcium Quantification Using a 256-Dector Row CT Scanner. Academic radiology. 2019 Oct:26(10):e267-e274. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 23     [PubMed PMID: 30685312]


[3]

Sharma SK, Bolduan RW, Patel MR, Martinsen BJ, Azemi T, Giugliano G, Resar JR, Mehran R, Cohen DJ, Popma JJ, Waksman R. Impact of calcification on percutaneous coronary intervention: MACE-Trial 1-year results. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2019 Aug 1:94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28099. Epub 2019 Jan 25     [PubMed PMID: 30681262]


[4]

Williams MC, Moss AJ, Dweck M, Adamson PD, Alam S, Hunter A, Shah ASV, Pawade T, Weir-McCall JR, Roditi G, van Beek EJR, Newby DE, Nicol ED. Coronary Artery Plaque Characteristics Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the SCOT-HEART Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019 Jan 29:73(3):291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.066. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30678759]


[5]

Lemanowicz A, Białecki M, Leszczyński W, Hawrył M. Coronary age, based on coronary calcium measurement, is increased in patients with morbid obesity. Polish journal of radiology. 2018:83():e415-e420. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2018.78624. Epub 2018 Sep 5     [PubMed PMID: 30655919]


[6]

Kowall B, Lehmann N, Mahabadi AA, Moebus S, Erbel R, Jöckel KH, Stang A. Associations of metabolically healthy obesity with prevalence and progression of coronary artery calcification: Results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Cohort Study. Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD. 2019 Mar:29(3):228-235. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 15     [PubMed PMID: 30648599]


[7]

Gheorghe AG, Jacobsen C, Thomsen R, Linnet K, Lynnerup N, Andersen CB, Fuchs A, Kofoed KF, Banner J. Coronary artery CT calcium score assessed by direct calcium quantification using atomic absorption spectroscopy and compared to macroscopic and histological assessments. International journal of legal medicine. 2019 Sep:133(5):1485-1496. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-01998-8. Epub 2019 Jan 4     [PubMed PMID: 30610447]


[8]

Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, Klein AJ, Riley RF, Price MJ, Herrmann HC, Bachinsky W, Waksman R, Stone GW, Disrupt CAD III Investigators. Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2020 Dec 1:76(22):2635-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.603. Epub 2020 Oct 15     [PubMed PMID: 33069849]


[9]

Shavadia JS, Vo MN, Bainey KR. Challenges With Severe Coronary Artery Calcification in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Narrative Review of Therapeutic Options. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2018 Dec:34(12):1564-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.07.482. Epub 2018 Aug 14     [PubMed PMID: 30527144]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[10]

Cano-Megías M, Bouarich H, Guisado-Vasco P, Pérez Fernández M, de Arriba-de la Fuente G, Álvarez-Sanz C, Rodríguez-Puyol D. Coronary artery calcification in patients with diabetes mellitus and advanced chronic kidney disease. Endocrinologia, diabetes y nutricion. 2019 May:66(5):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Nov 30     [PubMed PMID: 30509882]


[11]

Guo J, Nunley KA, Costacou T, Miller RG, Rosano C, Edmundowicz D, Orchard TJ. Greater progression of coronary artery calcification is associated with clinically relevant cognitive impairment in type 1 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2019 Jan:280():58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 8     [PubMed PMID: 30471556]