Back To Search Results

Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Umbilical Cord

Editor: Brody J. Lipsett Updated: 7/26/2025 12:34:14 PM

Introduction

The umbilical cord serves as the biological lifeline between mother and fetus, functioning as a conduit for blood and nutrients while transferring fetal waste products to the placenta. Beyond its anatomical significance, the umbilical cord carries spiritual importance in many cultures, representing both a physical and symbolic connection between mother and unborn child. Severance of the cord marks the child's entry into society. Poets have called it "the thread of life."

A crucial structure formed during the early stages of embryological development, the umbilical cord consists of a bundle of blood vessels enclosed within a tubular sheath of amnion. The structure typically contains 2 umbilical arteries and 1 umbilical vein.

The umbilical arteries transport deoxygenated blood from the fetus to the placenta during fetal development.[1] After birth, the distal portions of these arteries undergo degeneration and give rise to the medial umbilical ligaments.[2] The proximal segments persist and contribute to the formation of the anterior division of the internal iliac arteries. These blood vessels subsequently give rise to the superior vesical arteries, which supply the urinary bladder, ureters, and, in the male body, the ductus deferens and seminal vesicles.[3][4] The umbilical cord maintains a critical role throughout gestation by securing the fetus to the placenta and uterine wall and enabling continuous blood circulation between the fetus and the placenta.[5]

Structure and Function

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Structure and Function

Anatomical Features of the Umbilical Cord

The umbilical cord appears as a soft, tortuous structure with a smooth outer covering of amnion. Extension spans from the fetal umbilicus to the placental center. Variability in placental attachment gives rise to differences in insertion. Average length ranges from 50 to 60 cm, with a diameter of approximately 1 cm.[6] Within the cord lies a gelatinous connective tissue known as the Wharton jelly (substantia gelatinea funiculi umbilicalis), composed primarily of mucopolysaccharides such as hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate. This matrix encases the umbilical vessels and the urachus.[7]

Three vessels develop within the umbilical cord: 2 umbilical arteries and 1 umbilical vein. Both right and left umbilical veins are present initially, but the right umbilical vein undergoes regression by the 6th week of intrauterine life.[8]

The urachus, a fibrous remnant of the allantois, traverses the umbilical cord.[9] Unique to fetal life, this structure connects the urinary bladder to the allantoic cavity and occupies the space of Retzius, positioned between the peritoneum posteriorly and the transverse fascia anteriorly. The urachus functions as a fetal drainage conduit for the urinary bladder (see Image. Umbilical Cord).[10]

Function

The umbilical cord operates as a bidirectional conduit, transporting oxygen, nutrients, and oxygenated blood from the placenta to the fetus, while returning deoxygenated blood from the fetus to the placenta.[11] Umbilical arteries convey deoxygenated blood from fetal circulation toward the placenta. Approximately 5 mm proximal to the placental insertion, the 2 arteries converge to form a vascular anastomosis known as the Hyrtl anastomosis.[12] The primary role of this vascular network is to equalize blood flow and pressure between the umbilical and placental arteries.[13] Upon placental entry, the umbilical arteries divide into smaller branches termed "chorionic vessels."

Embryology

In the 3rd week of embryonic development, gastrulation initiates differentiation of the germinal tissues into 3 distinct layers: outer ectoderm, intraembryonic mesoderm, and inner endoderm.[14][15] Formation of the umbilical cord unfolds across 3 developmental stages and coincides with the gastrulation process (see Image. Embryo at Approximately 6 Weeks).

Stage I: Formation of the Primitive Umbilical Ring

The embryonic surface begins to protrude into the amniotic cavity concurrent with the folding of the embryonic disc. As folding progresses, the amniotic-ectodermal junction—a firm connection between the amnion and ectoderm—shifts to occupy the ventral aspect of the embryo. The line of reflection between the amnion and ectoderm adopts an oval contour, designated as the primitive umbilical ring.

Stage II: Development of the Primitive Umbilical Cord

By the 5th week of pregnancy, constriction of the primitive umbilical ring gives rise to a tubular sheath. This sheath, termed the "primitive umbilical cord," encloses the body stalk, the yolk sac and its associated vessels, along with a segment of the allantois.

Stage III: Emergence of the Definitive Umbilical Cord

Elongation of the umbilical cord characterizes this stage, accompanied by primary modifications of its internal structures. Differentiation of the extraembryonic mesoderm within the body stalk gives rise to the Wharton jelly, a mucoid connective tissue that gradually develops to form the main bulk of the umbilical cord. Degeneration of the residual extraembryonic coelom within the cord progresses simultaneously.

Obliteration of the yolk sac occurs along with regression of the vitellointestinal duct, which initially connects the yolk sac to the midgut. The distal segment of the allantois also becomes obliterated. In contrast, the allantoic vessels remain and elongate to form the umbilical vessels.

A portion of the midgut loop enters the umbilical cord by the 6th week of development, producing a physiological herniation. Return of this herniated midgut to the abdominal cavity typically occurs after the 10th week of pregnancy.[16]

Blood Supply and Lymphatics

The umbilical cord, in coordination with the placenta, supports and regulates fetal circulation. The 2 umbilical arteries originate from the internal iliac arteries of the fetus and pass into the umbilical cord before branching further within the placenta. Each artery divides into smaller arterioles at the placental level, giving rise to chorionic vessels that distribute blood to the chorionic villi, the fetal component of the placenta. Capillary networks within the villi coalesce into venules that merge to form the umbilical vein.

The umbilical vein transports oxygenated blood and nutrients from the maternal circulation to the fetus.[17] Entry of the vein into the fetal abdomen directs blood toward both the liver parenchyma and the ductus venosus. From the ductus venosus, blood flows into the inferior vena cava and then to the fetal heart. A substantial portion of this oxygen-rich blood is shunted through the foramen ovale into the left atrium, bypassing the pulmonary circulation.[18]

Both placental intervillous circulation and umbilical circulation undergo gradual development as fetal growth progresses, reaching functional maturity by the end of the 1st trimester. Umbilical vein blood flow increases steadily from approximately 63 mL/min at 20 weeks of gestation to more than 370 mL/min by 38 weeks.[19] When normalized to estimated fetal weight, an inverse relationship emerges between umbilical vein blood flow and estimated fetal weight. At midgestation, umbilical blood accounts for approximately 30% of total fetal cardiac output. During the 3rd trimester, the proportion of umbilical blood flow relative to fetal weight declines markedly, falling to 20% or less.

Discussion of lymphatic drainage within the placenta and umbilical cord in scientific literature is currently limited. Recent findings have identified D2-40 expression within the placental stroma as a key feature of fetal lymphatic drainage. This marker is associated with podoplanin-expressing cells involved in the formation of a reticular network resembling lymphatic architecture. These specialized cells appear to mediate lymphatic drainage from both the umbilical cord and the placenta.[20]

Nerves

Absence of innervation characterizes the umbilical cord throughout all stages of embryonic development. In contrast, the umbilical vessels are surrounded by a dense neural plexus, which has been proposed to influence their vasomotor responses.[21] Regulation of smooth muscle tone within the umbilical vasculature depends on both locally secreted vasoactive substances within the vessel wall and agents delivered via the fetal circulation. Nitric oxide and prostacyclin are essential for maintaining low vascular resistance in the umbilical and placental circulations. In contrast, catecholamines serve as the principal mediators of umbilical vessel vasoconstriction following parturition.[22]

Muscles

The bulk of the umbilical cord is composed of the Wharton jelly, reflecting the absence of voluntary skeletal muscle within the structure. However, the umbilical vasculature contains multiple smooth muscle layers with varying composition and thickness. The walls of the umbilical vessels are organized into 3 primary layers: tunica externa, tunica media, and tunica interna.

Tunica Externa

Also known as the tunica adventitia, this outermost layer consists of fibrous and elastic connective tissue with variable amounts of collagen and elastic fibers. Dense connective tissue predominates near the tunica media, while a transition to looser connective tissue occurs toward the periphery of the vessel wall. Greater connective tissue density characterizes the tunica externa of the umbilical arteries compared to that of the umbilical vein.[23]

Tunica Media

The tunica media occupies the intermediate position within the wall of the umbilical vessels. Composed primarily of smooth muscle, this layer forms the muscular bulk of the vessel and provides mechanical support. Active regulation of vessel diameter occurs within the tunica media, influencing both blood flow and pressure through the umbilical cord. The tunica media is typically the thickest among the vascular layers. The tunica media is significantly thicker in the umbilical arteries than in the umbilical vein. Internal and external elastic membranes are well defined in the umbilical arteries but are often less distinct or absent in the walls of the umbilical vein.[24]

Tunica Interna

Also referred to as the tunica intima, the tunica interna constitutes the innermost layer of the umbilical vasculature. This layer consists of simple squamous epithelium resting on a basement membrane composed of connective tissue rich in elastic fibers. Together, these elements form the endothelium of the umbilical vessels. The tunica interna of the umbilical vein contains valves that promote unidirectional blood flow and prevent regurgitation. These valves are absent in the walls of the umbilical arteries.[25] Human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells are routinely isolated postdelivery and employed as experimental models to advance the understanding of smooth muscle cell physiology.[26]

Physiologic Variants

Umbilical Cord Coiling Patterns

One of the most frequent morphological variations of the umbilical cord involves differences in its helical coiling pattern. The 4 principal types include rope (the most common), undulating, segmented, and linked configurations. The degree of coiling is quantified by the umbilical cord index, typically measuring around 0.2 coils/cm.

Hypercoiling is defined by an umbilical cord index exceeding 0.3 coils/cm and occurs in approximately 6% to 21% of all pregnancies.[27] Abnormal coiling patterns are strongly associated with fetal vascular obstruction, a condition that may lead to complications such as fetal thrombi, avascular villi, and villous stromal vascular karyorrhexis.[28]

False Knots of the Umbilical Cord

False knots appear as bulging masses along the surface of the umbilical cord. These formations result from redundant loops or folds of the umbilical vessels within the cord, commonly referred to as "folds of Hoboken."[29] Excessive torsion of the cord may exaggerate these bulges on prenatal ultrasonography, mimicking the appearance of true knots. Uneven distribution of the Wharton jelly contributes to the formation of these structures. Thick accumulations create the bulges, while thinner regions produce intervening constrictions. This physiologic variation does not impair fetal positioning, umbilical blood flow, or vascular pressure. Consequently, false knots do not pose a significant risk to the fetus.[30]

Single Umbilical Artery

A single umbilical artery (SUA) occurs infrequently but is more commonly observed in multiparous patients than in nulliparous ones. Presence of an SUA alters fetal hemodynamics, prompting close monitoring of vascular parameters such as the resistance index, pulsatility index, and systole-to-diastole ratio.[31] Absence of the left umbilical artery is more frequent than absence of the right.[32] Identification of an SUA on prenatal ultrasound is associated with an increased incidence of congenital anomalies, particularly affecting the cardiac, renal, gastrointestinal, and skeletal systems when the left artery is absent.[32][33][34][35][36] Additional studies have suggested a possible association between SUA and an elevated risk of urinary tract infections in neonates.[37]

Surgical Considerations

Anesthetic Considerations

Uterine myometrial tone and maternal blood pressure exert direct influence on uterine artery blood flow, which subsequently affects placental and umbilical circulation, thereby altering fetal oxygen delivery. Volatile anesthetics typically reduce myometrial tone and lower maternal blood pressure, resulting in diminished placental perfusion and decreased fetal oxygenation. Severe maternal hypercapnia induces vasoconstriction, which may impair venous return through the umbilical vein and contribute to fetal hypoxia.

Obstetric Considerations

Ostetric ultrasonography is employed during pregnancy to screen for fetal growth restriction. Growth-restricted fetuses face an increased risk of uteroplacental insufficiency, a condition associated with adverse obstetric outcomes, including stillbirth. Umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography serves as a tool to evaluate fetoplacental vascular resistance. Elevated resistance indicates the presence and severity of placental insufficiency. Spectral Doppler waveforms of the umbilical arteries are used to calculate the pulsatility index, which quantifies downstream resistance, and the resistance index, which measures the proportion of systolic flow maintained during diastole. Elevated pulsatility and resistance index values indicate increased placental vascular resistance and impaired fetoplacental perfusion.

Progressive uteroplacental insufficiency follows a predictable pattern of hemodynamic decline. Initial findings include pulsatility index values exceeding the 95th percentile. Subsequent reduction in end-diastolic flow increases the systolic-to-diastolic flow ratio. Complete absence of end-diastolic flow may then occur, followed by reversed end-diastolic flow, indicating severe placental compromise.[38] Optimal Doppler measurements should be obtained from a free loop of the umbilical cord using angle-independent indices. These umbilical artery parameters serve as reliable indicators of fetoplacental circulatory integrity and inform critical obstetric management decisions.

Umbilical Vascular Access in Neonatal Resuscitation

The umbilical vein serves as the primary access point for vascular cannulation in the neonate. This blood vessel remains patent for approximately a week following delivery and provides a reliable route for administering intravenous fluids and medications in newborns requiring advanced resuscitative support. During umbilical vein catheterization, the catheter is advanced through the ductus venosus and inferior vena cava, with the tip positioned near the right atrium of the heart.[39]

Umbilical artery lines may also be placed during the 1st week of life for resuscitative and monitoring purposes. Umbilical artery catheterization provides direct access for continuous blood pressure monitoring, serial arterial blood gas sampling, and contrast-enhanced angiographic studies.[40]

Clinical Significance

Various umbilical cord abnormalities may pose serious threats to fetal health or result in fetal demise. Therefore, early detection, accurate diagnosis, and appropriate management are of critical clinical importance. The section below discusses some of these abnormalities.

Velamentous Insertion

Velamentous cord insertion (VCI) occurs when the umbilical cord inserts at the periphery of the placenta rather than centrally. The term also refers to cases in which the cord vessels separate and travel between the amnion and chorion, without the protection of the Wharton jelly, before reaching the placental disc (see Image. Velamentous Cord Insertion).[41]

VCI occurs in singleton gestations conceived naturally but is more prevalent in multiple gestations and in pregnancies achieved through in vitro fertilization (IVF).[42] Although the precise mechanism remains unclear, the leading hypothesis proposes that asymmetric placental development, marked by proliferation of one placental pole and involution of the other, results in peripheral displacement of the umbilical cord insertion site.

VCI is associated with impaired placental perfusion and fetal oxygen delivery because the unprotected vessels are vulnerable to external compression and rupture. This condition increases the risk of numerous obstetric complications, including the delivery of small-for-gestational-age neonates [relative risk (RR) 1.93], preeclampsia (RR 1.85), placental abruption (RR 2.94), preterm delivery (RR 2.14), emergency cesarean section (RR 2.03), low Apgar scores, and stillbirth (RR 4.12).[43] Additionally, VCI heightens the risk of complications during the 3rd stage of labor, with increased rates of manual placental removal (5-fold), curettage (3-fold), and postpartum hemorrhage (2-fold).[44]

Of particular concern is the strong association between VCI and vasa previa, a condition marked by exposed fetal vessels crossing the internal cervical os. These vessels are highly susceptible to tearing during membrane rupture or active labor, with potentially catastrophic fetal hemorrhage.

Four-Vessel Umbilical Cord

The normal umbilical cord contains 3 vessels: 2 umbilical arteries and 1 umbilical vein. The right umbilical vein typically regresses by the 7th week of gestation, leaving only the left umbilical vein patent. Rarely, the umbilical cord retains all 4 vessels—2 arteries and 2 veins. This anomaly is associated with a higher incidence of congenital abnormalities, particularly affecting the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal systems.[45] Persistence of both umbilical veins results in a condition known as persistent right umbilical vein. This abnormality is believed to arise from disruptions during early embryogenesis, possibly related to folate deficiency in the 1st trimester. The condition may have teratogenic effects and has been linked to adverse fetal outcomes.[46]

True Knots of the Umbilical Cord

True knots are genuine entanglements of the umbilical cord that form during gestation, often in the early stages of pregnancy. Several risk factors contribute to the development of these knots, including polyhydramnios, long umbilical cord length, and increased fetal mobility. These factors increase torsional stress on the cord and predispose to supercoiling and looping. True knots may compromise blood flow through the umbilical vessels, particularly during labor, and are associated with an increased risk of fetal hypoxia and, in severe cases, fetal demise.[47]

Abnormal Umbilical Cord Length

An umbilical cord is considered abnormally short when its length measures less than 40 cm. A markedly short cord may result in premature placental separation, which can interrupt fetal circulation and lead to intrauterine hemorrhage and fetal death.[48]

By contrast, an umbilical cord longer than 65 to 70 cm is considered excessively long. A long umbilical cord may encircle the fetal neck, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. A long umbilical cord may also descend into the cervix during malpresentation, leading to umbilical cord prolapse.[49]

Omphalocele

Also known as exomphalos, an omphalocele is a congenital abdominal wall defect in which bowel and, at times, other abdominal organs herniate into a membranous sac at the base of the umbilical cord. This anomaly results from the failure of the physiological umbilical herniation to resolve during development.[50] Surgical correction is typically undertaken in the neonatal period to prevent complications, such as intestinal obstruction.

Umbilical Cysts

Umbilical cord cysts are classified as either true cysts or pseudocysts. These lesions are typically identified near the fetal insertion site of the umbilical cord and are most commonly detected during the 1st trimester. Most resolve spontaneously by the end of the 12th week of gestation. Umbilical cysts occur in approximately 3.4% of all pregnancies.

The most frequently encountered type is the pseudocyst, also referred to as a "Wharton jelly cyst." These formations lack an epithelial lining and arise from focal edema or mucoid degeneration within the Wharton jelly. Pseudocysts may appear as single or multiple lesions, typically measuring less than 2 cm in diameter.

In contrast, true cysts of the umbilical cord are derived from persistent embryologic structures, most commonly the omphalomesenteric duct or the allantois. True cysts possess a distinct epithelial lining, which differentiates them histologically from pseudocysts.[51]

Although many umbilical cysts are transient and benign, their presence, particularly when persistent into the 2nd or 3rd trimester, may indicate underlying chromosomal abnormalities. Reported associations include trisomy 13, trisomy 18, imperforate anus, and angiomyxoma of the umbilical cord.[52] Fetal karyotyping and amniocentesis may be warranted for further evaluation in such cases.

Delayed Umbilical Cord Separation

Normal umbilical cord separation occurs within the first few weeks of life, although the timing varies. Separation is considered delayed when it occurs more than 3 weeks after delivery. Multiple factors contribute to delayed detachment, including the topical application of antiseptics such as alcohol, antibiotics, or triple dye. Pathological causes include localized or systemic infections, immune disorders such as leukocyte adhesion deficiency, and congenital anomalies like urachal remnants. Studies also associate delayed separation with prematurity, cesarean delivery, and low birth weight. Further evaluation is warranted in neonates with delayed cord separation accompanied by skin infections or persistent umbilical anomalies, including urachal remnants.

Umbilical Granuloma

An umbilical granuloma is a benign vascular lesion that may develop after the umbilical cord detaches. These nodules, typically measuring around 5 mm in diameter, form as a result of excessive fibroblast proliferation and granulation tissue at the base of the umbilicus.[53] Grossly, these lesions have a moist, red, strawberry-like appearance due to prominent capillaries on their surface.[54] The standard treatment is chemical cauterization using silver nitrate, applied carefully to avoid injury to the surrounding skin.

Media


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Velamentous Cord Insertion

Velamentous Cord Insertion. The umbilical cord attaches to the membranes instead of the placental surface. Umbilical vessels travel unprotected between the amnion and chorion, without the surrounding Wharton jelly. These vessels are fragile and prone to injury during labor or membrane rupture.

contributed by Karen S. Carlson, MD


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Embryo at Approximately&nbsp;6 Weeks

Embryo at Approximately 6 Weeks. Lateral view of a human embryo showing early limb development and branchial region. Forelimbs and hindlimbs are distinct, and digits have begun to separate. The umbilical cord is visible at the ventral abdominal wall.

Henry Vandyke Carter, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons


(Click Image to Enlarge)
<p>Umbilical Cord

Umbilical Cord. This cross-section of the umbilical cord shows 2 umbilical arteries and 1 umbilical vein surrounded by the Wharton jelly. The allantois is also visible as a small remnant. The Wharton jelly provides cushioning and protection for the vessels, which are essential for fetal blood circulation.

Contributed by S Bhimji, MD

References


[1]

Barrios-Arpi LM, Rodríguez Gutiérrez JL, Lopez-Torres B. Histological characterization of umbilical cord in alpaca (Vicugna pacos). Anatomia, histologia, embryologia. 2017 Dec:46(6):533-538. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12298. Epub 2017 Sep 7     [PubMed PMID: 28884482]


[2]

Tokar B, Yucel F. Anatomical variations of medial umbilical ligament: clinical significance in laparoscopic exploration of children. Pediatric surgery international. 2009 Dec:25(12):1077-80. doi: 10.1007/s00383-009-2467-y. Epub 2009 Aug 30     [PubMed PMID: 19727772]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[3]

Mamatha H, Hemalatha B, Vinodini P, Souza AS, Suhani S. Anatomical Study on the Variations in the Branching Pattern of Internal Iliac Artery. The Indian journal of surgery. 2015 Dec:77(Suppl 2):248-52. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0785-0. Epub 2012 Dec 20     [PubMed PMID: 26730003]


[4]

Hooper SB, Polglase GR, te Pas AB. A physiological approach to the timing of umbilical cord clamping at birth. Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition. 2015 Jul:100(4):F355-60. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305703. Epub 2014 Dec 24     [PubMed PMID: 25540147]


[5]

Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D'Addario V. Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2001 Jun:96(2):150-7     [PubMed PMID: 11384798]


[6]

Fathi AH, Soltanian H, Saber AA. Surgical anatomy and morphologic variations of umbilical structures. The American surgeon. 2012 May:78(5):540-4     [PubMed PMID: 22546125]


[7]

Stefańska K, Ożegowska K, Hutchings G, Popis M, Moncrieff L, Dompe C, Janowicz K, Pieńkowski W, Gutaj P, Shibli JA, Prado WM, Piotrowska-Kempisty H, Mozdziak P, Bruska M, Zabel M, Kempisty B, Nowicki M. Human Wharton's Jelly-Cellular Specificity, Stemness Potency, Animal Models, and Current Application in Human Clinical Trials. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020 Apr 12:9(4):. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041102. Epub 2020 Apr 12     [PubMed PMID: 32290584]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[8]

Kozadinos A, Mylonakis A, Bekos F, Kydonakis N, Korovesis G, Kastanaki P, Despotidis M, Chrysikos D, Troupis T. The Development of the Umbilical Vein and Its Anatomical and Clinical Significance. Cureus. 2025 Feb:17(2):e79712. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79712. Epub 2025 Feb 26     [PubMed PMID: 40161047]


[9]

Parada Villavicencio C, Adam SZ, Nikolaidis P, Yaghmai V, Miller FH. Imaging of the Urachus: Anomalies, Complications, and Mimics. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc. 2016 Nov-Dec:36(7):2049-2063     [PubMed PMID: 27831842]


[10]

Umeda S, Usui N, Kanagawa T, Yamamichi T, Nara K, Ueno T, Owari M, Uehara S, Oue T, Kimura T, Okuyama H. Prenatal and Postnatal Clinical Course of an Urachus Identified as an Allantoic Cyst in the Umbilical Cord. European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie. 2016 Apr:26(2):200-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549263. Epub 2016 Mar 16     [PubMed PMID: 26981767]


[11]

Spurway J, Logan P, Pak S. The development, structure and blood flow within the umbilical cord with particular reference to the venous system. Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine. 2012 Aug:15(3):97-102. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2012.tb00013.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31     [PubMed PMID: 28191152]


[12]

Ullberg U, Sandstedt B, Lingman G. Hyrtl's anastomosis, the only connection between the two umbilical arteries. A study in full term placentas from AGA infants with normal umbilical artery blood flow. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2001 Jan:80(1):1-6     [PubMed PMID: 11167180]


[13]

Ullberg U, Lingman G, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Sandstedt B. Hyrtl's anastomosis is normally developed in placentas from small for gestational age infants. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2003 Aug:82(8):716-21     [PubMed PMID: 12848642]


[14]

Coetzee AJ, Castro E, Peres LC. Umbilical Cord Coiling and Zygosity: Is there a Link? Fetal and pediatric pathology. 2015:34(5):336-9. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2015.1075634. Epub 2015 Aug 20     [PubMed PMID: 26291249]


[15]

Muhr J, Arbor TC, Ackerman KM. Embryology, Gastrulation. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 32119281]


[16]

Hubbard LJ, Stanford DA. The Umbilical Cord Lifeline. Journal of emergency nursing. 2017 Nov:43(6):593-595. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.07.010. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29100578]


[17]

Kiserud T, Acharya G. The fetal circulation. Prenatal diagnosis. 2004 Dec 30:24(13):1049-59     [PubMed PMID: 15614842]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[18]

Strong A, Gračner T, Chen P, Kapinos K. On the Value of the Umbilical Cord Blood Supply. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2018 Sep:21(9):1077-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 12     [PubMed PMID: 30224112]


[19]

Barbieri M, Zamagni G, Fantasia I, Monasta L, Lo Bello L, Quadrifoglio M, Ricci G, Maso G, Piccoli M, Di Martino DD, Ferrazzi EM, Stampalija T. Umbilical Vein Blood Flow in Uncomplicated Pregnancies: Systematic Review of Available Reference Charts and Comparison with a New Cohort. Journal of clinical medicine. 2023 Apr 26:12(9):. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093132. Epub 2023 Apr 26     [PubMed PMID: 37176573]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Jin ZW, Nakamura T, Yu HC, Kimura W, Murakami G, Cho BH. Fetal anatomy of peripheral lymphatic vessels: a D2-40 immunohistochemical study using an 18-week human fetus (CRL 155 mm). Journal of anatomy. 2010 Jun:216(6):671-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01229.x. Epub 2010 Apr 7     [PubMed PMID: 20408907]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[21]

Fox H, Jacobson HN. Innervation of the human umbilical cord and umbilical vessels. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1969 Feb 1:103(3):384-9     [PubMed PMID: 4178744]


[22]

Marx GF, Joshi CW, Orkin LR. Placental transmission of nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1970 May:32(5):429-32     [PubMed PMID: 5445031]


[23]

DeFreitas MJ, Mathur D, Seeherunvong W, Cano T, Katsoufis CP, Duara S, Yasin S, Zilleruelo G, Rodriguez MM, Abitbol CL. Umbilical artery histomorphometry: a link between the intrauterine environment and kidney development. Journal of developmental origins of health and disease. 2017 Jun:8(3):349-356. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000113. Epub 2017 Mar 6     [PubMed PMID: 28260559]


[24]

Hardy KJ, Nye DH. The anatomy of the umbilical vein. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 1969 Nov:39(2):127-32     [PubMed PMID: 5264514]


[25]

Baudin B, Bruneel A, Bosselut N, Vaubourdolle M. A protocol for isolation and culture of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Nature protocols. 2007:2(3):481-5     [PubMed PMID: 17406610]


[26]

Cairrão E, Santos-Silva AJ, Alvarez E, Correia I, Verde I. Isolation and culture of human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells expressing functional calcium channels. In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal. 2009 Mar-Apr:45(3-4):175-84. doi: 10.1007/s11626-008-9161-6. Epub 2009 Jan 1     [PubMed PMID: 19118440]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[27]

Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J. The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2006 Oct:95(1):8-13     [PubMed PMID: 16860802]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[28]

Ernst LM, Minturn L, Huang MH, Curry E, Su EJ. Gross patterns of umbilical cord coiling: correlations with placental histology and stillbirth. Placenta. 2013 Jul:34(7):583-8. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 2     [PubMed PMID: 23642640]


[29]

Röckelein G, Kobras G, Becker V. Physiological and pathological morphology of the umbilical and placental circulation. Pathology, research and practice. 1990 Feb:186(1):187-96     [PubMed PMID: 2315213]


[30]

Feliks M, Howorka E. [Functional value of false knots of the umbilical cord]. Ginekologia polska. 1968 Jun:39(6):617-24     [PubMed PMID: 5675023]


[31]

Kazci O, Aydin S, Fatihoglu E, Tokur O, Bahadir S, Karavas E, Kantarci M. Normal umbilical artery doppler values in 18-22 week old fetuses with single umbilical artery. Scientific reports. 2023 Jun 28:13(1):10477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37691-z. Epub 2023 Jun 28     [PubMed PMID: 37380720]


[32]

Lubusky M, Dhaifalah I, Prochazka M, Hyjanek J, Mickova I, Vomackova K, Santavy J. Single umbilical artery and its siding in the second trimester of pregnancy: relation to chromosomal defects. Prenatal diagnosis. 2007 Apr:27(4):327-31     [PubMed PMID: 17286313]


[33]

Geipel A, Germer U, Welp T, Schwinger E, Gembruch U. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler findings and perinatal outcome. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2000 Feb:15(2):114-7     [PubMed PMID: 10775992]


[34]

Blazer S, Sujov P, Escholi Z, Itai BH, Bronshtein M. Single umbilical artery--right or left? does it matter? Prenatal diagnosis. 1997 Jan:17(1):5-8     [PubMed PMID: 9021822]


[35]

Budorick NE, Kelly TF, Dunn JA, Scioscia AL. The single umbilical artery in a high-risk patient population: what should be offered? Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2001 Jun:20(6):619-27; quiz 628     [PubMed PMID: 11400936]


[36]

Abuhamad AZ, Shaffer W, Mari G, Copel JA, Hobbins JC, Evans AT. Single umbilical artery: does it matter which artery is missing? American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1995 Sep:173(3 Pt 1):728-32     [PubMed PMID: 7573234]


[37]

Sepulveda W, Peek MJ, Hassan J, Hollingsworth J. Umbilical vein to artery ratio in fetuses with single umbilical artery. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996 Jul:8(1):23-6     [PubMed PMID: 8843614]


[38]

Rocha AS, Andrade ARA, Moleiro ML, Guedes-Martins L. Doppler Ultrasound of the Umbilical Artery: Clinical Application. Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia. 2022 May:44(5):519-531. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743097. Epub 2022 Apr 11     [PubMed PMID: 35405757]


[39]

Tomek S, Asch S. Umbilical vein catheterization in the critical newborn: a review of anatomy and technique. EMS world. 2013 Feb:42(2):50-2     [PubMed PMID: 23469464]


[40]

. Umbilical-artery catheters. The New England journal of medicine. 1979 Feb 8:300(6):316-7     [PubMed PMID: 759887]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[41]

Rocha J,Carvalho J,Costa F,Meireles I,do Carmo O, Velamentous cord insertion in a singleton pregnancy: an obscure cause of emergency cesarean-a case report. Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology. 2012;     [PubMed PMID: 23243528]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[42]

Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter TF, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, Hankins GD, Eddleman K, Dolan S, Dugoff L, Craigo S, Timor IE, Carr SR, Wolfe HM, Bianchi DW, D'Alton ME. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2005 Nov:106(5 Pt 1):1039-45     [PubMed PMID: 16260523]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[43]

Siargkas A,Tsakiridis I,Pachi C,Mamopoulos A,Athanasiadis A,Dagklis T, Impact of velamentous cord insertion on perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of obstetrics     [PubMed PMID: 36379439]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[44]

Ebbing C, Kiserud T, Johnsen SL, Albrechtsen S, Rasmussen S. Third stage of labor risks in velamentous and marginal cord insertion: a population-based study. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015 Aug:94(8):878-83. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12666. Epub 2015 May 25     [PubMed PMID: 25943426]


[45]

Painter D, Russell P. Four-vessel umbilical cord associated with multiple congenital anomalies. Obstetrics and gynecology. 1977 Oct:50(4):505-7     [PubMed PMID: 904818]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[46]

Kim JH, Jin ZW, Murakami G, Chai OH, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF. Persistent right umbilical vein: a study using serial sections of human embryos and fetuses. Anatomy & cell biology. 2018 Sep:51(3):218-222. doi: 10.5115/acb.2018.51.3.218. Epub 2018 Sep 28     [PubMed PMID: 30310717]


[47]

Sepulveda W, Shennan AH, Bower S, Nicolaidis P, Fisk NM. True knot of the umbilical cord: a difficult prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1995 Feb:5(2):106-8     [PubMed PMID: 7719859]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[48]

Olaya-C M, Bernal JE. Clinical associations to abnormal umbilical cord length in Latin American newborns. Journal of neonatal-perinatal medicine. 2015:8(3):251-6. doi: 10.3233/NPM-15915056. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26485559]


[49]

Wong L, Kwan AHW, Lau SL, Sin WTA, Leung TY. Umbilical cord prolapse: revisiting its definition and management. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2021 Oct:225(4):357-366. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.077. Epub 2021 Jun 26     [PubMed PMID: 34181893]


[50]

Wakhlu A, Wakhlu AK. The management of exomphalos. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2000 Jan:35(1):73-6     [PubMed PMID: 10646778]


[51]

Whipple NS, Bennett EE, Kaza E, O'Connor M. Umbilical Cord Pseudocyst in a Newborn. The Journal of pediatrics. 2016 Oct:177():333. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.060. Epub 2016 Jul 26     [PubMed PMID: 27473880]


[52]

Hannaford K, Reeves S, Wegner E. Umbilical cord cysts in the first trimester: are they associated with pregnancy complications? Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2013 May:32(5):801-6. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.5.801. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23620322]


[53]

Muniraman H, Sardesai T, Sardesai S. Disorders of the Umbilical Cord. Pediatrics in review. 2018 Jul:39(7):332-341. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0202. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29967078]


[54]

Ancer-Arellano J, Argenziano G, Villarreal-Martinez A, Cardenas-de la Garza JA, Villarreal-Villarreal CD, Ocampo-Candiani J. Dermoscopic findings of umbilical granuloma. Pediatric dermatology. 2019 May:36(3):393-394. doi: 10.1111/pde.13774. Epub 2019 Feb 27     [PubMed PMID: 30811653]